Culiacan Sinaloa Mexico. Remarks from Colombia’s President Gustavo Petro that the Sinaloa Cartel is the “current boss” of the National Liberation Army (Ejército de Liberación Nacional – ELN) suggest a relationship of subordination between the two groups that remains unproven.
Petro emphasized the importance of education in preventing young people from taking up arms and being paid by “Mexican and foreign cartels to kill their own brothers, as happens in Catatumbo,” when he spoke at the inauguration of a scientific complex in Bucaramanga, Colombia in early February.
The president asserted that the true “owners of these structures are not Colombian commanders, but those from Mexican groups who buy cocaine.”
His remarks came amid an escalation of violence in Catatumbo, a region near the Venezuelan border, where the ELN launched a large-scale offensive against dissidents from the demobilized Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (Fuerzas Armadas Revolucionarias de Colombia – FARC), reigniting a territorial war that has displaced more than 50,000 people in just a month.
InSight Crime Analysis
Contrary to Petro’s comments, Mexican cartels have not managed to establish their own structures in Colombia to control cocaine production and trafficking. Their presence remains sporadic and reliant on local actors.
Although they have forged alliances with armed groups in Colombia to secure the cocaine supply chain, the ELN’s history suggests that it maintains autonomy.
Colombia has always been a hostile environment for foreign criminal actors, creating obstacles for Mexican cartels who have been forced to rely on emissaries—business representatives and quality control supervisors who oversee the entire process, from coca cultivation to cocaine packaging and transportation.
Rather than imposing direct control, Mexican emissaries focus on quality control and optimizing the supply chain, reducing risks and cutting out intermediaries without getting involved in local conflicts.
Geographical, political, and social conditions have made it difficult for Mexican cartels to establish permanent bases, limiting their ability to operate without the support of local actors.
SEE ALSO: Mexico Crime Profile: Criminal Groups, Security Forces, Prisons, and the Judicial System
This longstanding arrangement has proven effective, and Colombian criminal groups have maintained enduring partnerships with Mexican groups for drug trafficking while still holding territorial control.
Given these limitations, Mexican groups have opted to solidify alliances with local armed actors, including the ELN, the Gaitanist Self-Defense Forces of Colombia (Autodefensas Gaitanistas de Colombia – AGC), and FARC dissidents.
These partnerships have allowed them to guarantee cocaine trafficking routes from key regions such as Cauca, Catatumbo, and Córdoba to Caribbean ports, facilitating exports to North America and Europe.
SEE ALSO: The US-Mexico Border Under Trump: What Trump’s Harsh Immigration Policy Means for the Border’s Crime
So as Mexican cartels gain secure access to cocaine production and transportation, Colombian groups retain territorial control and operate under their own interests, avoiding subjugation.
This dynamic reinforces the power of Colombian organizations, which capitalize on external demand without relinquishing autonomy.
Despite their financial influence, Mexican cartels continue to face significant barriers to operating independently in Colombia, an inhospitable environment for foreign criminal actors.
